lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Feb]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: [RFC][PATCH 00/16] sched: Core scheduling
    From
    Date

    On 2/21/19 6:03 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
    > On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 06:53:08PM -0800, Subhra Mazumdar wrote:
    >> On 2/18/19 9:49 AM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
    >>> On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 9:40 AM Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
    >>>> However; whichever way around you turn this cookie; it is expensive and nasty.
    >>> Do you (or anybody else) have numbers for real loads?
    >>>
    >>> Because performance is all that matters. If performance is bad, then
    >>> it's pointless, since just turning off SMT is the answer.
    >>>
    >>> Linus
    >> I tested 2 Oracle DB instances running OLTP on a 2 socket 44 cores system.
    >> This is on baremetal, no virtualization.
    > I'm thinking oracle schedules quite a bit, right? Then you get massive
    > overhead (as shown).
    >
    Out of curiosity I ran the patchset from Amazon with the same setup to see
    if performance wise it was any better. But it looks equally bad. At 32
    users it performed even worse and the idle time increased much more. Only
    good thing about it was it was being fair to both the instances as seen in
    the low %stdev

    Users  Baseline %stdev  %idle  cosched     %stdev %idle
    16     1        2.9     66     0.93(-7%)   1.1 69
    24     1        11.3    53     0.87(-13%)  11.2 61
    32     1        7       41     0.66(-34%)  5.3     54

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2019-02-22 01:37    [W:3.067 / U:0.016 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site