Messages in this thread | | | From | Madalin-cristian Bucur <> | Subject | RE: [PATCH 00/20] DPAA fixes | Date | Wed, 9 Oct 2019 05:53:58 +0000 |
| |
> -----Original Message----- > From: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com> > Sent: Wednesday, October 9, 2019 7:02 AM > Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/20] DPAA fixes > > On Tue, 8 Oct 2019 15:10:21 +0300, Madalin Bucur wrote: > > Here's a series of fixes and changes for the DPAA 1.x drivers. > > Fixing some boot time dependency issues, removing some dead code, > > changing the buffers used for reception, fixing the DMA devices, > > some cleanups. > > Hi Madalin! > > The title of this series says "DPAA fixes", are these bug fixes? > If so they should target the net tree ([PATCH net]) and contain > appropriate Fixes tags. > > Cleanups should go into the net-next tree ([PATCH net-next]). > > Please try to not post more than 15 patches in one series, it clogs > up the review flow. > > For some of those and other best practices please see: > > https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/submitting-patches.html > https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/networking/netdev-FAQ.html > > :) > > IMHO there is also no need at all to CC linux-kernel on networking > patches..
Hi Jakub,
I should have added the net-next target in the subject. I can split the (minor) fixes from the other changes. I've added "Fixes" tags to the fix patches already. In regards to the patch count, I can send two patch sets but it won't reduce the total...
Regards, Madalin
| |