Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | Date | Mon, 16 Jul 2018 08:46:26 +0000 | From | Nicholas Mc Guire <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] ARM: STi: at least warn if of_iomap fails |
| |
On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 07:55:08AM +0000, Patrice CHOTARD wrote: > Hi Nicholas > > On 07/12/2018 05:48 PM, Nicholas Mc Guire wrote: > > The call to of_iomap() is unchecked but scu_enable(), which the returned > > address is passed on to, assumes a valid mapping. If the mapping is > > invalid this could probably lead to undefined system state so at least > > a warning should be issued. > > > > Signed-off-by: Nicholas Mc Guire <hofrat@osadl.org> > > Fixes: commit 65ebcc115889 ("ARM: sti: Add STiH415 SOC support") > > --- > > Problem was found by an experimental coccinelle script > > > > Patch was compile tested with: multi_v7_defconfig (implies > > CONFIG_ARCH_STI=y, CONFIG_SMP=y) > > > > Patch is against 4.18-rc3 (localversion-next is next-20180712) > > > > arch/arm/mach-sti/platsmp.c | 1 + > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-sti/platsmp.c b/arch/arm/mach-sti/platsmp.c > > index 231f19e..89ae76f 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm/mach-sti/platsmp.c > > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-sti/platsmp.c > > @@ -109,6 +109,7 @@ static void __init sti_smp_prepare_cpus(unsigned int max_cpus) > > > > if (np) { > > scu_base = of_iomap(np, 0); > > + WARN_ON(!scu_base); > > scu_enable(scu_base); > > of_node_put(np); > > } > > > > I should prefer to exit with an error to avoid unpredictable behavior, > something like this is better : > > scu_base = of_iomap(np, 0); > of_node_put(np); > if (!scu_base) { > pr_err("No SCU remap\n"); > return; > } > > scu_enable(scu_base); > even though it would be possible to locate that then from that message would it not be prefereable to provide the infos upfront like:
pr_err("SCU remap failed at %s:%s():%d\n", __FILE__, __func__, __LINE__);
if that makes sense I´ll resend - or is that considered too verbouse ?
thx! hofrat
| |