Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 14 Jul 2018 19:38:12 +0200 | From | Pavel Machek <> | Subject | Re: bug-introducing patches |
| |
Hi!
> > The way I see it, if a commit can get one or two tested-by, it's a good > > alternative to a week in -next. > > Agreed. Even their own actually. And I'm not kidding. Those who run large > amounts of tests on certain patches could really mention is in tested-by, > as opposed to the most common cases where the code was just regularly > tested.
Actually, it would be cool to get "Tested: no" and "Tested: compile" tags in the commit mesages. Sometimes it is clear from the context that patch was not tested (treewide update of time to 64bit), but sometime it is not.
This is especially problem for -stable, as it seems that lately patches are backported from new version without any testing. Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
| |