lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Jun]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v4 2/7] dt-bindings: Introduce interconnect provider bindings
Date
Hi Neil,

Apologies for the delayed response.

On 12.04.18 г. 16:15, Neil Armstrong wrote:
> On 09/03/2018 22:09, Georgi Djakov wrote:
>> This binding is intended to represent the interconnect hardware present
>> in some of the modern SoCs. Currently it consists only of a binding for
>> the interconnect hardware devices (provider).
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Georgi Djakov <georgi.djakov@linaro.org>
>> ---
>> .../bindings/interconnect/interconnect.txt | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 47 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interconnect/interconnect.txt
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interconnect/interconnect.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interconnect/interconnect.txt
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..70612bb201e4
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interconnect/interconnect.txt
>> @@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
>> +Interconnect Provider Device Tree Bindings
>> +=========================================
>> +
>> +The purpose of this document is to define a common set of generic interconnect
>> +providers/consumers properties.
>> +
>> +
>> += interconnect providers =
>> +
>> +The interconnect provider binding is intended to represent the interconnect
>> +controllers in the system. Each provider registers a set of interconnect
>> +nodes, which expose the interconnect related capabilities of the interconnect
>> +to consumer drivers. These capabilities can be throughput, latency, priority
>> +etc. The consumer drivers set constraints on interconnect path (or endpoints)
>> +depending on the usecase. Interconnect providers can also be interconnect
>> +consumers, such as in the case where two network-on-chip fabrics interface
>> +directly
>
> Hi,
>
> Can't we specify the number of cells for the phandle ? It should be aligned with other consumer/provider bindings.

Yes, that's the plan. Will align it!

Thanks,
Georgi

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-06-06 17:23    [W:0.078 / U:6.748 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site