Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/3] Provide more fine grained control over multipathing | From | Sagi Grimberg <> | Date | Wed, 6 Jun 2018 12:32:21 +0300 |
| |
>> We plan to implement all the fancy NVMe standards like ANA, but it >> seems that there is still a requirement to let the host side choose >> policies about how to use paths (round-robin vs least queue depth for >> example). Even in the modern SCSI world with VPD pages and ALUA, >> there are still knobs that are needed. Maybe NVMe will be different >> and we can find defaults that work in all cases but I have to admit >> I'm skeptical... > > The sensible thing to do in nvme is to use different paths for > different queues.
Huh? different paths == different controllers so this sentence can't be right... you mean that a path selector will select a controller based on the home node of the local rdma device connecting to it and the running cpu right?
| |