Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 5 Jun 2018 08:50:10 -0400 (EDT) | From | Mathieu Desnoyers <> | Subject | Re: [RFC PATCH for 4.18 09/16] powerpc: Add syscall detection for restartable sequences |
| |
----- On Jun 5, 2018, at 1:21 AM, Michael Ellerman mpe@ellerman.id.au wrote:
> Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> writes: >> From: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> >> >> Syscalls are not allowed inside restartable sequences, so add a call to >> rseq_syscall() at the very beginning of system call exiting path for >> CONFIG_DEBUG_RSEQ=y kernel. This could help us to detect whether there >> is a syscall issued inside restartable sequences. >> >> [ Tested on 64-bit powerpc kernel by Mathieu Desnoyers. Still needs to >> be tested on 32-bit powerpc kernel. ] >> >> Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> >> Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> >> CC: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> >> CC: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> >> CC: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> >> CC: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> >> CC: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> >> CC: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org >> --- >> arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_32.S | 7 +++++++ >> arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_64.S | 8 ++++++++ >> 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+) > > I don't _love_ the #ifdefs in here, but they look correct and there's > not really a better option until we rewrite the syscall handler in C. > > The rseq selftests passed for me with this applied and enabled. So if > you like here's some tags: > > Tested-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> > Acked-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> >
Adding you ack to the series.
Thanks!
Mathieu
-- Mathieu Desnoyers EfficiOS Inc. http://www.efficios.com
| |