lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Jun]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [patch 2/8] genirq/generic_pending: Do not lose pending affinity update
From
Date
Hi Thomas,

At 06/04/2018 11:33 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> The generic pending interrupt mechanism moves interrupts from the interrupt
> handler on the original target CPU to the new destination CPU. This is
> required for x86 and ia64 due to the way the interrupt delivery and
> acknowledge works if the interrupts are not remapped.
>
> However that update can fail for various reasons. Some of them are valid
> reasons to discard the pending update, but the case, when the previous move
> has not been fully cleaned up is not a legit reason to fail.
>
> Check the return value of irq_do_set_affinity() for -EBUSY, which indicates
> a pending cleanup, and rearm the pending move in the irq dexcriptor so it's

s/dexcriptor/descriptor

> tried again when the next interrupt arrives.
>
> Fixes: 996c591227d9 ("x86/irq: Plug vector cleanup race")
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner<tglx@linutronix.de>
> Cc:stable@vger.kernel.org
> ---
> kernel/irq/migration.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> --- a/kernel/irq/migration.c
> +++ b/kernel/irq/migration.c
> @@ -38,17 +38,18 @@ bool irq_fixup_move_pending(struct irq_d
> void irq_move_masked_irq(struct irq_data *idata)
> {
> struct irq_desc *desc = irq_data_to_desc(idata);
> - struct irq_chip *chip = desc->irq_data.chip;
> + struct irq_data *data = &desc->irq_data;
> + struct irq_chip *chip = data->chip;
>
> - if (likely(!irqd_is_setaffinity_pending(&desc->irq_data)))
> + if (likely(!irqd_is_setaffinity_pending(data)))
> return;
>
> - irqd_clr_move_pending(&desc->irq_data);
> + irqd_clr_move_pending(data);
>
> /*
> * Paranoia: cpu-local interrupts shouldn't be calling in here anyway.
> */
> - if (irqd_is_per_cpu(&desc->irq_data)) {
> + if (irqd_is_per_cpu(data)) {
> WARN_ON(1);
> return;
> }
> @@ -73,9 +74,20 @@ void irq_move_masked_irq(struct irq_data
> * For correct operation this depends on the caller
> * masking the irqs.
> */
> - if (cpumask_any_and(desc->pending_mask, cpu_online_mask) < nr_cpu_ids)
> - irq_do_set_affinity(&desc->irq_data, desc->pending_mask, false);
> + if (cpumask_any_and(desc->pending_mask, cpu_online_mask) < nr_cpu_ids) {
> + int ret;
>
> + ret = irq_do_set_affinity(data, desc->pending_mask, false);
> + /*
> + * If the there is a cleanup pending in the underlying

s/If the there is/If there is/

Thanks,
dou


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-06-05 13:22    [W:0.027 / U:1.528 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site