Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | From | Srikar Dronamraju <> | Subject | [PATCH 05/19] sched/numa: Use task faults only if numa_group is not yet setup | Date | Mon, 4 Jun 2018 15:30:14 +0530 |
| |
When numa_group faults are available, task_numa_placement only uses numa_group faults to evaluate preferred node. However it still accounts task faults and even evaluates the preferred node just based on task faults just to discard it in favour of preferred node chosen on the basis of numa_group.
Instead use task faults only if numa_group is not set.
Testcase Time: Min Max Avg StdDev numa01.sh Real: 506.35 794.46 599.06 104.26 numa01.sh Sys: 150.37 223.56 195.99 24.94 numa01.sh User: 43450.69 61752.04 49281.50 6635.33 numa02.sh Real: 60.33 62.40 61.31 0.90 numa02.sh Sys: 18.12 31.66 24.28 5.89 numa02.sh User: 5203.91 5325.32 5260.29 49.98 numa03.sh Real: 696.47 853.62 745.80 57.28 numa03.sh Sys: 85.68 123.71 97.89 13.48 numa03.sh User: 55978.45 66418.63 59254.94 3737.97 numa04.sh Real: 444.05 514.83 497.06 26.85 numa04.sh Sys: 230.39 375.79 316.23 48.58 numa04.sh User: 35403.12 41004.10 39720.80 2163.08 numa05.sh Real: 423.09 460.41 439.57 13.92 numa05.sh Sys: 287.38 480.15 369.37 68.52 numa05.sh User: 34732.12 38016.80 36255.85 1070.51
Testcase Time: Min Max Avg StdDev %Change numa01.sh Real: 478.45 565.90 515.11 30.87 16.29% numa01.sh Sys: 207.79 271.04 232.94 21.33 -15.8% numa01.sh User: 39763.93 47303.12 43210.73 2644.86 14.04% numa02.sh Real: 60.00 61.46 60.78 0.49 0.871% numa02.sh Sys: 15.71 25.31 20.69 3.42 17.35% numa02.sh User: 5175.92 5265.86 5235.97 32.82 0.464% numa03.sh Real: 776.42 834.85 806.01 23.22 -7.47% numa03.sh Sys: 114.43 128.75 121.65 5.49 -19.5% numa03.sh User: 60773.93 64855.25 62616.91 1576.39 -5.36% numa04.sh Real: 456.93 511.95 482.91 20.88 2.930% numa04.sh Sys: 178.09 460.89 356.86 94.58 -11.3% numa04.sh User: 36312.09 42553.24 39623.21 2247.96 0.246% numa05.sh Real: 393.98 493.48 436.61 35.59 0.677% numa05.sh Sys: 164.49 329.15 265.87 61.78 38.92% numa05.sh User: 33182.65 36654.53 35074.51 1187.71 3.368%
Ideally this change shouldn't have affected performance.
Signed-off-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> --- kernel/sched/fair.c | 20 ++++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c index 94091e6..e7c07aa 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c @@ -2072,8 +2072,8 @@ static int preferred_group_nid(struct task_struct *p, int nid) static void task_numa_placement(struct task_struct *p) { - int seq, nid, max_nid = -1, max_group_nid = -1; - unsigned long max_faults = 0, max_group_faults = 0; + int seq, nid, max_nid = -1; + unsigned long max_faults = 0; unsigned long fault_types[2] = { 0, 0 }; unsigned long total_faults; u64 runtime, period; @@ -2152,15 +2152,15 @@ static void task_numa_placement(struct task_struct *p) } } - if (faults > max_faults) { - max_faults = faults; + if (!p->numa_group) { + if (faults > max_faults) { + max_faults = faults; + max_nid = nid; + } + } else if (group_faults > max_faults) { + max_faults = group_faults; max_nid = nid; } - - if (group_faults > max_group_faults) { - max_group_faults = group_faults; - max_group_nid = nid; - } } update_task_scan_period(p, fault_types[0], fault_types[1]); @@ -2168,7 +2168,7 @@ static void task_numa_placement(struct task_struct *p) if (p->numa_group) { numa_group_count_active_nodes(p->numa_group); spin_unlock_irq(group_lock); - max_nid = preferred_group_nid(p, max_group_nid); + max_nid = preferred_group_nid(p, max_nid); } if (max_faults) { -- 1.8.3.1
| |