lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Jun]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: Memory zeroed when made available to user process
From
Date
On 6/27/2018 1:18 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 27. Juni 2018, 15:12:48 CEST schrieb Michal Hocko:
>> On Wed 27-06-18 13:29:05, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 11:34 AM, Jefferson Carpenter
>>> <jeffersoncarpenter2@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Is there a way for a user process to mark memory as 'sensitive' or
>>>> 'non-sensitive' when it is allocated? That could allow it not to have to be
>>>> zeroed before being allocated to another process.
>>>
>>> Isn't this what we have Meltdown and Spectre for? ;-)
>>>
>>> No, memory from the kernel is always zeroed.
>>> libc offers malloc() and calloc() for this purpose.

Interesting. Let's say

Process 1:
free(use_memory(malloc(1024)));

Then Process 2:
malloc(1024);

The physical RAM used to service Process 2's malloc call has to be
zeroed to prevent it from leaking data from Process 1. However, if
Process 1 could mark that memory as non-sensitive, then it would not
have to be zeroed, saving the time it takes to do that. However, this
would require at least a bit per memory page, so maybe it's not worth it.

>>
>> Well, except for the weird MAP_UNINITIALIZED. Anyway agreed that this is
>> a bad idea and the flag should have never been merged. I've just
>> mentioned it for completness.
>
> Oh, I forgot about the crazy nommu world. :-)
>
> Thanks,
> //richard
>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-06-29 02:53    [W:0.287 / U:0.008 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site