lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Jun]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: power: Add Actions Semi S900 SPS
Hi Andreas,

On Sun, Jun 24, 2018 at 03:04:21PM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Hi Mani,
>
> Am 11.04.2018 um 18:40 schrieb Manivannan Sadhasivam:
> > Define power domains for Actions Semi S900 SoC Smart Power System (SPS).
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
> > ---
> > .../devicetree/bindings/power/actions,owl-sps.txt | 2 ++
> > include/dt-bindings/power/owl-s900-powergate.h | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/power/owl-s900-powergate.h
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/actions,owl-sps.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/actions,owl-sps.txt
> > index 78edd63641e8..a3571937b019 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/actions,owl-sps.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/actions,owl-sps.txt
> > @@ -3,11 +3,13 @@ Actions Semi Owl Smart Power System (SPS)
> > Required properties:
> > - compatible : "actions,s500-sps" for S500
> > "actions,s700-sps" for S700
> > + "actions,s900-sps" for S900
> > - reg : Offset and length of the register set for the device.
> > - #power-domain-cells : Must be 1.
> > See macros in:
> > include/dt-bindings/power/owl-s500-powergate.h for S500
> > include/dt-bindings/power/owl-s700-powergate.h for S700
> > + include/dt-bindings/power/owl-s900-powergate.h for S900
> >
> >
> > Example:
> > diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/power/owl-s900-powergate.h b/include/dt-bindings/power/owl-s900-powergate.h
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..f1aaf761112b
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/include/dt-bindings/power/owl-s900-powergate.h
> > @@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
> > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
>
> checkpatch.pl warns about this line due to not using /* ... */ syntax
> for headers. I could fix that up on my own, but it made me realize that
> you are licensing this file under GPL-2.0+ only, whereas the .dts[i] is
> supposed to be dual-licensed.
>
> Can you please give your consent to make this
>
> /* SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0+ OR MIT) */
>

You can change the license to GPL-2.0+ OR MIT.

> like my S500 and S700 bindings?
>
> Question: Should it still be GPL-2.0+ or the new GPL-2.0-or-later?
>

I think GPL-2.0+ is fine.

Thanks,
Mani

> Otherwise looks fine, except that I'll need a topic branch
> (v4.19/s900-sps-bindings) if we want to merge the driver portion at the
> same time.
>
> Regards,
> Andreas
>
> > +/*
> > + * Actions Semi S900 SPS
> > + *
> > + * Copyright (c) 2018 Linaro Ltd.
> > + */
> > +#ifndef DT_BINDINGS_POWER_OWL_S900_POWERGATE_H
> > +#define DT_BINDINGS_POWER_OWL_S900_POWERGATE_H
> > +
> > +#define S900_PD_GPU_B 0
> > +#define S900_PD_VCE 1
> > +#define S900_PD_SENSOR 2
> > +#define S900_PD_VDE 3
> > +#define S900_PD_HDE 4
> > +#define S900_PD_USB3 5
> > +#define S900_PD_DDR0 6
> > +#define S900_PD_DDR1 7
> > +#define S900_PD_DE 8
> > +#define S900_PD_NAND 9
> > +#define S900_PD_USB2_H0 10
> > +#define S900_PD_USB2_H1 11
> > +
> > +#endif
> >
>
>
> --
> SUSE Linux GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
> GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton
> HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-06-26 19:28    [W:0.113 / U:0.804 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site