lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Jun]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH 06/16] x86/split_lock: Save #AC setting for split lock in firmware in boot time and restore the setting in reboot
    On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 04:11:07PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
    > On Thu, 2018-06-21 at 21:58 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
    > > On Sun, May 27, 2018 at 08:45:55AM -0700, Fenghua Yu wrote:
    > > > Firmware may contain split locked instructions.
    > >
    > > I think that's the wrong attitude. You should mandate in your BIOS
    > > development guide that Firmware _MUST_NOT_ contain unaligned LOCK
    > > prefixed instructions.
    > >
    >
    > In the longer term I would agree entirely with that sentiment.

    But then how do we deal with SMIs ? The firmware people will at least
    need to know about this, and the quick fix is to make the SMI handler
    save/restore the MSR, but since they're aware and already changing their
    code, they might as well fix the actual problem -- which is likely
    trivial.

    So no, I don't buy it. Just fix the firmware instead of allowing them to
    fester and grow layers of ducttape.

    Because even for SMM WRMSR is 100s of cycles, and why would they want to
    make every single SMI more expensive.

    Also, as mentioned earlier, what are we going to do about SMIs in
    general? They're a _far_ _FAR_ bigger problem for RT workloads than a
    sporadic split atomic. Esp. with some vendors thinking they can run
    bitcoin miners in SMI (or whatever else it is that is taking miliseconds
    of compute time).

    Split atomics are an insignificant problem compared to the nightmare
    trainwreck that is SMM.

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2018-06-26 11:06    [W:4.224 / U:0.932 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site