lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Jun]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH V9] powercap/drivers/idle_injection: Add an idle injection framework
On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 1:52 PM, Daniel Lezcano
<daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> wrote:
> On 25/06/2018 10:23, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> [ ... ]
>
>>> + * It is up to the user of this framework to provide a lock at an
>>> + * upper level to prevent stupid things to happen, like starting while
>>> + * we are unregistering.
>>> + */
>>
>> The English above and elsewhere needs some polishing IMO, but I can
>> take care of that. :-)
>
> I can give a try and if you are still unhappy, you change them in a
> better way.

Well, I could tell you what I would write, but then it'll take less
time and effort if I just write it myself. :-)

> [ ... ]
>
>>> +static void idle_injection_setup(unsigned int cpu)
>>> +{
>>> + struct sched_param param = { .sched_priority = MAX_USER_RT_PRIO / 2 };
>>> +
>>> + set_freezable();
>>
>> Why do you need set_freezable() here?
>
> We don't want to continue injecting idle cycles when the system is
> suspended.

And where's the corresponding try_to_freeze() called?

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-06-25 23:56    [W:0.057 / U:0.180 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site