lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Jun]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH 4.14 155/189] x86/pkeys/selftests: Give better unexpected fault error messages
Date
4.14-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>

[ Upstream commit 55556b0b2016806b2e16a20b62d143383983a34a ]

do_not_expect_pk_fault() is a helper that we call when we do not expect
a PK fault to have occurred. But, it is a function, which means that
it obscures the line numbers from pkey_assert(). It also gives no
details.

Replace it with an implementation that gives nice line numbers and
also lets callers pass in a more descriptive message about what
happened that caused the unexpected fault.

Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Michael Ellermen <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180509171338.55D13B64@viggo.jf.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c | 13 +++++++------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

--- a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c
@@ -954,10 +954,11 @@ void expected_pk_fault(int pkey)
last_si_pkey = -1;
}

-void do_not_expect_pk_fault(void)
-{
- pkey_assert(last_pkru_faults == pkru_faults);
-}
+#define do_not_expect_pk_fault(msg) do { \
+ if (last_pkru_faults != pkru_faults) \
+ dprintf0("unexpected PK fault: %s\n", msg); \
+ pkey_assert(last_pkru_faults == pkru_faults); \
+} while (0)

int test_fds[10] = { -1 };
int nr_test_fds;
@@ -1243,7 +1244,7 @@ void test_ptrace_of_child(int *ptr, u16
pkey_assert(ret != -1);
/* Now access from the current task, and expect NO exception: */
peek_result = read_ptr(plain_ptr);
- do_not_expect_pk_fault();
+ do_not_expect_pk_fault("read plain pointer after ptrace");

ret = ptrace(PTRACE_DETACH, child_pid, ignored, 0);
pkey_assert(ret != -1);
@@ -1287,7 +1288,7 @@ void test_executing_on_unreadable_memory
*/
madvise(p1, PAGE_SIZE, MADV_DONTNEED);
lots_o_noops_around_write(&scratch);
- do_not_expect_pk_fault();
+ do_not_expect_pk_fault("executing on PROT_EXEC memory");
ptr_contents = read_ptr(p1);
dprintf2("ptr (%p) contents@%d: %x\n", p1, __LINE__, ptr_contents);
expected_pk_fault(pkey);

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-06-18 10:40    [W:0.764 / U:0.312 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site