lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Jun]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patches in this message
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] mm/memblock: add missing include <linux/bootmem.h>
On Fri, 15 Jun 2018 11:59:10 -0700 Tony Luck <tony.luck@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 12:41 PM, Mathieu Malaterre <malat@debian.org> wrote:
> > Commit 26f09e9b3a06 ("mm/memblock: add memblock memory allocation apis")
> > introduced two new function definitions:
> > ‘memblock_virt_alloc_try_nid_nopanic’
> > and
> > ‘memblock_virt_alloc_try_nid’.
> > Commit ea1f5f3712af ("mm: define memblock_virt_alloc_try_nid_raw")
> > introduced the following function definition:
> > ‘memblock_virt_alloc_try_nid_raw’
> >
> > This commit adds an includeof header file <linux/bootmem.h> to provide the
> > missing function prototypes. Silence the following gcc warning (W=1):
> >
> > mm/memblock.c:1334:15: warning: no previous prototype for ‘memblock_virt_alloc_try_nid_raw’ [-Wmissing-prototypes]
> > mm/memblock.c:1371:15: warning: no previous prototype for ‘memblock_virt_alloc_try_nid_nopanic’ [-Wmissing-prototypes]
> > mm/memblock.c:1407:15: warning: no previous prototype for ‘memblock_virt_alloc_try_nid’ [-Wmissing-prototypes]
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mathieu Malaterre <malat@debian.org>
>
> Sadly that breaks ia64 build:
>
> CC mm/memblock.o
> mm/memblock.c:1340: error: redefinition of ‘memblock_virt_alloc_try_nid_raw’
> ./include/linux/bootmem.h:335: error: previous definition of
> ‘memblock_virt_alloc_try_nid_raw’ was here
> mm/memblock.c:1377: error: redefinition of ‘memblock_virt_alloc_try_nid_nopanic’
> ./include/linux/bootmem.h:343: error: previous definition of
> ‘memblock_virt_alloc_try_nid_nopanic’ was here
> mm/memblock.c:1413: error: redefinition of ‘memblock_virt_alloc_try_nid’
> ./include/linux/bootmem.h:327: error: previous definition of
> ‘memblock_virt_alloc_try_nid’ was here
> make[1]: *** [mm/memblock.o] Error 1
> make: *** [mm/memblock.o] Error 2

Huh. How did that ever work. I guess it's either this:

--- a/mm/Makefile~a
+++ a/mm/Makefile
@@ -45,6 +45,7 @@ obj-y += init-mm.o

ifdef CONFIG_NO_BOOTMEM
obj-y += nobootmem.o
+ obj-$(CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK) += memblock.o
else
obj-y += bootmem.o
endif
@@ -53,7 +54,6 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_ADVISE_SYSCALLS) += fadvise
ifdef CONFIG_MMU
obj-$(CONFIG_ADVISE_SYSCALLS) += madvise.o
endif
-obj-$(CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK) += memblock.o

obj-$(CONFIG_SWAP) += page_io.o swap_state.o swapfile.o swap_slots.o
obj-$(CONFIG_FRONTSWAP) += frontswap.o

or this:

--- a/include/linux/bootmem.h~a
+++ a/include/linux/bootmem.h
@@ -154,7 +154,7 @@ extern void *__alloc_bootmem_low_node(pg
__alloc_bootmem_low_node(pgdat, x, PAGE_SIZE, 0)


-#if defined(CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK) && defined(CONFIG_NO_BOOTMEM)
+#if defined(CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK)

/* FIXME: use MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_* variants here */
#define BOOTMEM_ALLOC_ACCESSIBLE 0

and I'm not sure which. I think I'll just revert $subject for now.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-06-15 21:17    [W:0.072 / U:0.428 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site