lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Jun]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH V6] powercap/drivers/idle_injection: Add an idle injection framework
From
Date
On 13/06/2018 22:32, Pandruvada, Srinivas wrote:
> On Wed, 2018-06-13 at 22:19 +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> On 13/06/2018 22:07, Pandruvada, Srinivas wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2018-06-13 at 22:00 +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>>>> On 13/06/2018 17:54, Pandruvada, Srinivas wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, 2018-06-12 at 14:00 +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>>>>>> Initially, the cpu_cooling device for ARM was changed by
>>>>>> adding a
>>>>>> new
>>>>>> policy inserting idle cycles. The intel_powerclamp driver
>>>>>> does a
>>>>>> similar action.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Instead of implementing idle injections privately in the
>>>>>> cpu_cooling
>>>>>> device, move the idle injection code in a dedicated framework
>>>>>> and
>>>>>> give
>>>>>> the opportunity to other frameworks to make use of it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The framework relies on the smpboot kthreads which handles
>>>>>> via
>>>>>> its
>>>>>> main loop the common code for hotplugging and [un]parking.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This code was previously tested with the cpu cooling device
>>>>>> and
>>>>>> went
>>>>>> through several iterations. It results now in split code and
>>>>>> API
>>>>>> exported in the header file. It was tested with the cpu
>>>>>> cooling
>>>>>> device
>>>>>> with success.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> May be I have missed, but I don't see any use of powercap
>>>>> sysfs.
>>>>>
>>>>> We created powercap sys that user space is presented a common
>>>>> interface
>>>>> for power capping. The RAPL driver was also submitted as
>>>>> cooling
>>>>> device
>>>>> before, but suggestion was to create this powercap.
>>>>>
>>>>> So if powercap interface is not enough then may be we should
>>>>> enhance
>>>>> that.
>>>>
>>>> We are creating a framework for idle injection. This framework
>>>> can
>>>> then
>>>> be used by the cpu_cooling device, the power_clamp and in
>>>> addition a
>>>> power capping for ARM (if it makes sense).
>>>
>>> But in this case, why in drivers/powercap folder as this is another
>>> framework?
>>
>> I presented at OSPM 2nd the cpu idle cooling device. It is ARM
>> specific
>> but has some similarities with the power clamp driver.
>>
>> Some board come with power numbers defined in their DT and from there
>> we
>> are able to compute a targeted power by injecting idle cycles.
>>
>> As the idle injection allows to do also power capping, Rafael told me
>> to
>> move that to a framework (may be better say a component with exported
>> services or library) and put it in drivers/powercap.
> So Rafael wants it to be in powercap.

That is what I understood.




--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-06-13 22:35    [W:0.042 / U:8.368 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site