lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Jun]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Regression: x86/tsc: Fix mark_tsc_unstable()
On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 04:38:01PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 04:17:42PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 01:59:15PM +0000, Jeremy Cline wrote:
> > > A user has bisected the problem to the v4.16 commit 1ab4ca7c59d4
> > > ("x86/tsc: Fix mark_tsc_unstable()"). According to the reporter,
> > > explicitly setting "tsc=" on the kernel command line causes the boot to
> > > always succeed. All the users have Thinkpad T500s or T400s (Core 2 Duos)
> >
> > Weird. So Core2 typically triggers mark_tsc_unstable() in either
> > intel_idle or processor_idle. ISTR testing that when I did the patches.
> >
> > When I make that mark_tsc_unstable() in the idle drivers unconditional
> > and boot my ivb with that, it doesn't want to fail. I've booted the
> > machine 5 consequctive times without issue.
> >
> > Let me try and checkout -stable, maybe something's up with that.
>
> Nope -stable seems to be working as well on the IVB (with modification).
> I just dug up my T500 and that's actually still running the test kernel.
> Let me try and build the -stable kernel for that.

4.16.8 works without issue on my T500 with a debian/ubuntu like distro
config.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-06-11 17:31    [W:0.048 / U:0.216 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site