lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [May]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH net] macmace: Set platform device coherent_dma_mask
On Thu, 3 May 2018, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:

>
> Perhaps you can add a new helper
> (platform_device_register_simple_dma()?) that takes the DMA mask, too?

Would there be enough potential callers in future to justify that API?
It seems that there haven't been many in the past. I found four users of
platform_device_register_simple() which might benefit. Mostly these call
dma_set_coherent_mask() in the platform driver probe routine.

drivers/gpu/drm/etnaviv/etnaviv_drv.c
drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_drv.c
drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/omap_drv.c
drivers/parport/parport_pc.c

(Am I missing any others?)

To actually hoist the dma mask setup out of existing platform drivers
would have implications for every device that matches with those drivers.

That's a bit risky since I can't test those devices -- that's assuming I
could identify them all; sometimes platform device matching is not well
defined at build time (see loongson_sysconf.ecname).

So far, it looks like macmace and macsonic would be the only callers of
this new API call.

What's worse, if you do pass a dma_mask in struct platform_device_info,
you end up with this problem in platform_device_register_full():

if (pdevinfo->dma_mask) {
/*
* This memory isn't freed when the device is put,
* I don't have a nice idea for that though. Conceptually
* dma_mask in struct device should not be a pointer.
* See http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.pci/9081
*/
pdev->dev.dma_mask =
kmalloc(sizeof(*pdev->dev.dma_mask), GFP_KERNEL);

Most of the platform drivers that call dma_coerce_mask_and_coherent() are
using pdev->of_match_table, not platform_device_register_simple(). Many of
them have a comment like this:

/*
* Right now device-tree probed devices don't get dma_mask set.
* Since shared usb code relies on it, set it here for now.
* Once we have dma capability bindings this can go away.
*/

> With people setting the mask to kill the WARNING splat, this may become
> more common.

Since the commit which introduced the WARNING, only commits f61e64310b75
("m68k: set dma and coherent masks for platform FEC ethernets") and
7bcfab202ca7 ("powerpc/macio: set a proper dma_coherent_mask") seem to be
aimed at squelching that WARNING.

(Am I missing any others?)

So far, this is not looking like a common problem, and I'm having trouble
finding some way to improve on my original patches.

--

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-05-10 03:26    [W:0.090 / U:0.808 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site