lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [May]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v7 06/13] KVM: x86: Add Intel Processor Trace virtualization mode
From
Date
On 05/05/2018 00:15, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, May 04, 2018 at 11:44:09PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> On 04/05/2018 12:45, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>>> On Thu, May 03, 2018 at 04:38:23PM +0300, Alexander Shishkin wrote:
>>>> On Thu, May 03, 2018 at 02:50:12PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>>
>>>>> And you still need the module parameter to decide
>>>>> whether the host is _allowed_ to cause incomplete traces in the guest.
>>>>
>>>> Or rather a parameter to decide who wins in case both host and guest want
>>>> to trace the guest. That's arguably better than having different versions of
>>>> PT in the guest depending on a module parameter setting.
>>>
>>> Yes, that sounds like a much better approach.
>>
>> I don't think so. The possibility that the host would lose tracing data
>> just because the guest starts using PT seems hideous to me...
>
> Well, either way around is a fairly crap situation, the modparam at
> least lets the admin pick which it goes. But if you want to always let
> the host win, that's fine with me too, less knobs is better.

I expect that the default "system-wide" host wins will be used almost
always, with "host-guest" being used in case someone actually wants to
use PT in guests.

I agree that "Host-only, drop guest events" should be removed, since it
can be emulated by perf code. Luwei, can you change that?

Paolo

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-05-07 12:48    [W:0.056 / U:0.252 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site