lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [May]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] drm/atomic: Handling the case when setting old crtc for plane
On Thu, May 03, 2018 at 01:55:03PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Thu, May 03, 2018 at 11:24:59AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Thu, May 03, 2018 at 11:19:32AM +0530, Satendra Singh Thakur wrote:
> > > In the func drm_atomic_set_crtc_for_plane, with the current code,
> > > if crtc of the plane_state and crtc passed as argument to the func
> > > are same, entire func will executed in vein.
> > > It will get state of crtc and clear and set the bits in plane_mask.
> > > All these steps are not required for same old crtc.
> > > Ideally, we should do nothing in this case, this patch handles the same,
> > > and causes the program to return without doing anything in such scenario.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Satendra Singh Thakur <satendra.t@samsung.com>
> > > Cc: Madhur Verma <madhur.verma@samsung.com>
> > > Cc: Hemanshu Srivastava <hemanshu.s@samsung.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c | 4 +++-
> > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c
> > > index 7d25c42..5bd3365 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c
> > > @@ -1421,7 +1421,9 @@ drm_atomic_set_crtc_for_plane(struct drm_plane_state *plane_state,
> > > {
> > > struct drm_plane *plane = plane_state->plane;
> > > struct drm_crtc_state *crtc_state;
> > > -
> > > + /* Nothing to do for same crtc*/
> > > + if (plane_state->crtc == crtc)
> > > + return 0;
> >
> > I didn't do this (both here and in the set_crtc_for_connector functions)
> > because the overhead is probably way down in the noise compared to the
> > overall atomic commit machinery. Do you really see this as a hotpath?
>
> drm_atomic_set_crtc_for_connector() actually has this since commit
> e2d800a3ce1b ("drm: Avoid connector reference imbalance on error path")

Ok, applied for consistency. Thanks for the patch.
-Daniel
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-05-03 15:34    [W:0.167 / U:0.096 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site