lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [May]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
Subject[tip:sched/urgent] sched/fair: Fix the update of blocked load when newly idle
Commit-ID:  457be908c83637ee10bda085a23dc05afa3b14a0
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/457be908c83637ee10bda085a23dc05afa3b14a0
Author: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
AuthorDate: Thu, 26 Apr 2018 12:19:32 +0200
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
CommitDate: Thu, 3 May 2018 07:38:03 +0200

sched/fair: Fix the update of blocked load when newly idle

With commit:

31e77c93e432 ("sched/fair: Update blocked load when newly idle")

... we release the rq->lock when updating blocked load of idle CPUs.

This opens a time window during which another CPU can add a task to this
CPU's cfs_rq.

The check for newly added task of idle_balance() is not in the common path.
Move the out label to include this check.

Reported-by: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Fixes: 31e77c93e432 ("sched/fair: Update blocked load when newly idle")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180426103133.GA6953@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 54dc31e7ab9b..e3002e5ada31 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -9847,6 +9847,7 @@ static int idle_balance(struct rq *this_rq, struct rq_flags *rf)
if (curr_cost > this_rq->max_idle_balance_cost)
this_rq->max_idle_balance_cost = curr_cost;

+out:
/*
* While browsing the domains, we released the rq lock, a task could
* have been enqueued in the meantime. Since we're not going idle,
@@ -9855,7 +9856,6 @@ static int idle_balance(struct rq *this_rq, struct rq_flags *rf)
if (this_rq->cfs.h_nr_running && !pulled_task)
pulled_task = 1;

-out:
/* Move the next balance forward */
if (time_after(this_rq->next_balance, next_balance))
this_rq->next_balance = next_balance;
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-05-03 11:27    [W:0.088 / U:0.192 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site