lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [May]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2] mm/THP: use hugepage_vma_check() in khugepaged_enter_vma_merge()
Date


> On May 28, 2018, at 3:57 AM, Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@shutemov.name> wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 12:44:30PM -0700, Song Liu wrote:
>> khugepaged_enter_vma_merge() is using a different approach to check
>> whether a vma is valid for khugepaged_enter():
>>
>> if (!vma->anon_vma)
>> /*
>> * Not yet faulted in so we will register later in the
>> * page fault if needed.
>> */
>> return 0;
>> if (vma->vm_ops || (vm_flags & VM_NO_KHUGEPAGED))
>> /* khugepaged not yet working on file or special mappings */
>> return 0;
>>
>> This check has some problems. One of the obvious problems is that
>> it doesn't check shmem_file(), so that vma backed with shmem files
>> will not call khugepaged_enter(). Here is an example of failed madvise():
>>
>> /* mount /dev/shm with huge=advise:
>> * mount -o remount,huge=advise /dev/shm */
>> /* create file /dev/shm/huge */
>> #define HUGE_FILE "/dev/shm/huge"
>>
>> fd = open(HUGE_FILE, O_RDONLY);
>> ptr = mmap(NULL, FILE_SIZE, PROT_READ, MAP_PRIVATE, fd, 0);
>> ret = madvise(ptr, FILE_SIZE, MADV_HUGEPAGE);
>>
>> madvise() will return 0, but this memory region is never put in huge
>> page (check from /proc/meminfo: ShmemHugePages).
>>
>> This patch fixes these problems by reusing hugepage_vma_check() in
>> khugepaged_enter_vma_merge().
>>
>> vma->vm_flags is not yet updated in khugepaged_enter_vma_merge(),
>> so we need to pass the new vm_flags to hugepage_vma_check() through
>> a separate argument.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
>> ---
>> mm/khugepaged.c | 26 ++++++++++++--------------
>> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/khugepaged.c b/mm/khugepaged.c
>> index d7b2a4b..9f74e51 100644
>> --- a/mm/khugepaged.c
>> +++ b/mm/khugepaged.c
>> @@ -430,18 +430,15 @@ int __khugepaged_enter(struct mm_struct *mm)
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> +static bool hugepage_vma_check(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>> + unsigned long vm_flags);
>> +
>
> The patch looks good to me.
>
> But can we move hugepage_vma_check() here to avoid forward declaration of
> the function?

Thanks for the feedback! I will send v3 with this change.

Song



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-05-28 20:05    [W:0.096 / U:0.056 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site