lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [May]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH] net: stmmac: Avoid VLA usage
From
Date


On 05/02/2018 04:07 PM, Jose Abreu wrote:
>
>
> On 02-05-2018 13:36, Kees Cook wrote:
>> On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 1:54 AM, Jose Abreu <Jose.Abreu@synopsys.com> wrote:
>>> Hi Kees,
>>>
>>> On 01-05-2018 22:01, Kees Cook wrote:
>>>> In the quest to remove all stack VLAs from the kernel[1], this switches
>>>> the "status" stack buffer to use the existing small (8) upper bound on
>>>> how many queues can be checked for DMA, and adds a sanity-check just to
>>>> make sure it doesn't operate under pathological conditions.
>>>>
>>>> [1] https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__lkml.kernel.org_r_CA-2B55aFzCG-2DzNmZwX4A2FQpadafLfEzK6CC-3DqPXydAacU1RqZWA-40mail.gmail.com&d=DwIBAg&c=DPL6_X_6JkXFx7AXWqB0tg&r=WHDsc6kcWAl4i96Vm5hJ_19IJiuxx_p_Rzo2g-uHDKw&m=TBD6a7UY2VbpPmV9LOW_eHAyg8uPq1ZPDhq93VROTVE&s=4fvOST1HhWmZ4lThQe-dHCJYEXNOwey00BCXOWm8tKo&e=
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
>>>>
>>> I rather prefer the variables declaration in reverse-tree order,
>>> but thats just a minor pick.
>> I can explicitly reorder the other variables, if you want?
>
> No need by me, unless Giuseppe or Alexandre prefer that. Thanks!

No need.

>
> Best Regards,
> Jose Miguel Abreu
>
>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Jose Abreu <joabreu@synopsys.com>
>> Thanks!
>>
>>> PS: Is VLA warning switch in gcc already active? Because I didn't
>>> see this warning in my builds.
>> It is not. A bunch of people have been building with KCFLAGS=-Wvla to
>> find the VLAs and sending patches. Once we get rid of them all, we can
>> add the flag to the top-level Makefile.
>>
>> -Kees
>>
>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-05-02 16:23    [W:0.051 / U:0.444 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site