lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [May]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH -tip v3 0/7] kprobes: x86: Cleanup jprobe implementation on x86
On Fri, 18 May 2018 08:23:43 +0200
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> wrote:

>
> * Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> > x86: kprobes: Remove jprobe implementation
> > x86: kprobes: Ignore break_handler
> > x86: kprobes: Do not disable preempt on int3 path
>
> So this is another annoyance. Do you ever compare the changelogs and titles you
> write with the ones I actually commit? They are almost never the same, for example
> the titles to x86 level kprobes code are always trying to use this kind of prefix:
>
> b664d57f39d0: kprobes/x86: Remove IRQ disabling from jprobe handlers
> ee213fc72fd6: kprobes/x86: Set up frame pointer in kprobe trampoline
> a19b2e3d7839: kprobes/x86: Remove IRQ disabling from ftrace-based/optimized kprobes
> 5bb4fc2d8641: kprobes/x86: Disable preemption in ftrace-based jprobes
> 9a09f261a4fa: kprobes/x86: Disable preemption in optprobe
> cd52edad55fb: kprobes/x86: Move the get_kprobe_ctlblk() into irq-disabled block
> a8976fc84b64: kprobes/x86: Remove addressof() operators
>
> Not "x86: kprobes:" which is the wrong order anyway...

OK, I got it. And sorry for the prefix change.

>
> Could you please be more careful about all this in the future?

Yes, I promise it, use kprobes/x86: prefix for kprobes x86 part.

Thank you,

>
> Thanks,
>
> Ingo


--
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-05-18 16:11    [W:0.061 / U:4.668 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site