Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 17 May 2018 17:15:53 -0300 | From | Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 01/11] perf tests parse-events: Add intel_pt parse test |
| |
Em Wed, May 16, 2018 at 04:33:55PM -0500, Kim Phillips escreveu: > On Wed, 16 May 2018 11:48:58 -0300 > Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> wrote: > > > From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> > > > > To avoid regressions such as the one fixed by 4a35a9027f64 ("Revert > > "perf pmu: Fix pmu events parsing rule""), where '-e intel_pt//u' got > > broken, with this new entry in this 'perf tests' subtest, we would have > > caught it before pushing upstream. > > > > Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> > > Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> > > Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> > > Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> > > Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com> > > Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> > > Cc: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com> > > Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> > > Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> > > Cc: Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com> > > Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-kw62fys9bwdgsp722so2ln1l@git.kernel.org > > Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> > > --- > > This causes a SEGV on Arm, and an Intel box without Intel-PT h/w: > > (gdb) run test -F -v 6 > Starting program: /home/kimphi01/git/linux-perf-acme/tools/perf/perf test -F -v 6 > [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] > Using host libthread_db library "/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libthread_db.so.1". > 6: Parse event definition strings : > --- start --- > running test 0 'syscalls:sys_enter_openat' > Using CPUID GenuineIntel-6-3C > <SNIP> > running test 51 'L1-dcache-misses/name=cachepmu/' > running test 52 'intel_pt//u' > > Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. > __GI___vasprintf_chk (result_ptr=0x8, flags=1, format=<optimized out>, args=args@entry=0x7fffffffbf30) > at vasprintf_chk.c:88 > 88 vasprintf_chk.c: No such file or directory. > (gdb) bt > #0 __GI___vasprintf_chk (result_ptr=0x8, flags=1, format=<optimized out>, args=args@entry=0x7fffffffbf30) > at vasprintf_chk.c:88 > #1 0x00007ffff6456e6f in __asprintf_chk (result_ptr=result_ptr@entry=0x8, flags=flags@entry=1, > format=format@entry=0x555555992e80 "Cannot find PMU `%s'. Missing kernel support?") at asprintf_chk.c:32 > #2 0x0000555555766836 in asprintf (__fmt=0x555555992e80 "Cannot find PMU `%s'. Missing kernel support?", __ptr=0x8) > at /usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/bits/stdio2.h:178 > #3 parse_events_add_pmu (parse_state=parse_state@entry=0x7fffffffdda0, list=list@entry=0x555555e137d0, > name=0x5555563e84e0 "intel_pt", head_config=0x0, auto_merge_stats=auto_merge_stats@entry=false, > use_alias=use_alias@entry=false) at util/parse-events.c:1236
Humm:
struct parse_events_error *err = parse_state->error;
pmu = perf_pmu__find(name); if (!pmu) { if (asprintf(&err->str, "Cannot find PMU `%s'. Missing kernel support?", name) < 0)
$ pahole -C parse_events_error ~/bin/perf struct parse_events_error { int idx; /* 0 4 */
/* XXX 4 bytes hole, try to pack */
char * str; /* 8 8 */ char * help; /* 16 8 */
/* size: 24, cachelines: 1, members: 3 */ /* sum members: 20, holes: 1, sum holes: 4 */ /* last cacheline: 24 bytes */ }; $
So parse_state->error == NULL, Jiri, ideas?
- Arnaldo
> #4 0x00005555557aaaae in parse_events_parse (_parse_state=_parse_state@entry=0x7fffffffdda0, scanner=0x555555d38c40) > at util/parse-events.y:235 > #5 0x0000555555761ccf in parse_events__scanner (start_token=258, parse_state=0x7fffffffdda0, str=<optimized out>) > at util/parse-events.c:1796 > #6 parse_events (evlist=evlist@entry=0x555555d381f0, str=<optimized out>, err=err@entry=0x0) > at util/parse-events.c:1836 > #7 0x000055555571eb65 in test_event (e=0x555555bf4f80 <test.events+1248>, e=0x555555bf4f80 <test.events+1248>) > at tests/parse-events.c:1695 > #8 test_events (events=0x555555bf4aa0 <test.events>, cnt=53) at tests/parse-events.c:1717 > #9 test__parse_events (test=<optimized out>, subtest=<optimized out>) at tests/parse-events.c:1837 > #10 0x0000555555716a11 in run_test (subtest=-1, test=0x555555bfca78 <generic_tests+280>) at tests/builtin-test.c:348 > #11 test_and_print (t=t@entry=0x555555bfca78 <generic_tests+280>, force_skip=force_skip@entry=false, > subtest=subtest@entry=-1) at tests/builtin-test.c:378 > #12 0x0000555555717e2f in __cmd_test (skiplist=0x0, argv=0x7fffffffe5c0, argc=1) at tests/builtin-test.c:570 > #13 cmd_test (argc=1, argv=0x7fffffffe5c0) at tests/builtin-test.c:709 > #14 0x0000555555738b41 in run_builtin (p=0x555555bfd848 <commands+552>, argc=4, argv=0x7fffffffe5c0) at perf.c:303 > #15 0x0000555555738e3e in handle_internal_command (argc=4, argv=0x7fffffffe5c0) at perf.c:355 > #16 0x00005555556b3901 in run_argv (argcp=<synthetic pointer>, argv=<synthetic pointer>) at perf.c:399 > #17 main (argc=<optimized out>, argv=0x7fffffffe5c0) at perf.c:543 > (gdb) > > Thanks, > > Kim
| |