Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH] of: overlay: validate offset from property fixups | From | Frank Rowand <> | Date | Thu, 17 May 2018 09:58:28 -0700 |
| |
On 05/17/18 09:56, Frank Rowand wrote: > Hi Rob, > > On 05/16/18 21:19, frowand.list@gmail.com wrote: >> From: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@sony.com> >> >> The smatch static checker marks the data in offset as untrusted, >> leading it to warn: >> >> drivers/of/resolver.c:125 update_usages_of_a_phandle_reference() >> error: buffer underflow 'prop->value' 's32min-s32max' >> >> Add check to verify that offset is within the property data. >> >> Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> >> Signed-off-by: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@sony.com> >> --- >> drivers/of/resolver.c | 5 +++++ >> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/of/resolver.c b/drivers/of/resolver.c >> index 65d0b7adfcd4..7edfac6f1914 100644 >> --- a/drivers/of/resolver.c >> +++ b/drivers/of/resolver.c >> @@ -122,6 +122,11 @@ static int update_usages_of_a_phandle_reference(struct device_node *overlay, >> goto err_fail; >> } >> >> + if (offset < 0 || offset + sizeof(__be32) > prop->length) { >> + err = -EINVAL; >> + goto err_fail; >> + } >> + >> *(__be32 *)(prop->value + offset) = cpu_to_be32(phandle); >> } >> >> > > I should have mentioned that this results in a new compile warning > for W=2 and W=3. The new if statement results in: >
W=2 warning is:
> drivers/of/resolver.c:125:45: warning: comparison between signed and unsigned integer expressions [-Wsign-compare]
W=3 warning is:
drivers/of/resolver.c:125:3: warning: conversion to 'unsigned int' from 'int' may change the sign of the result [-Wsign-conversion]
> > There are other pre-existing warnings in the same file for comparing > an integer to prop->length. The correct solution is probably to > change the type of the length field in struct property to be > unsigned. I have added that task to my todo list. > > -Frank >
| |