lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [May]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: vm_fault_t conversion, for real
    On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 03:03:09PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
    > On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 04:23:47AM -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
    > > On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 07:43:34AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
    > > > this series tries to actually turn vm_fault_t into a type that can be
    > > > typechecked and checks the fallout instead of sprinkling random
    > > > annotations without context.
    > >
    > > Yes, why should we have small tasks that newcomers can do when the mighty
    > > Christoph Hellwig can swoop in and take over from them? Seriously,
    > > can't your talents find a better use than this?
    >
    > I've spent less time on this than trying to argue to you and Souptick
    > that these changes are only to get ignored and yelled at as an
    > "asshole maintainer". So yes, I could have done more productive things
    > if you hadn't forced this escalation.

    Perhaps you should try being less of an arsehole if you don't want to
    get yelled at? I don't mind when you're an arsehole towards me, but I
    do mind when you're an arsehole towards newcomers. How are we supposed
    to attract and retain new maintainers when you're so rude?

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2018-05-16 15:24    [W:4.269 / U:0.360 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site