lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [May]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 12/14] net: sched: retry action check-insert on concurrent modification
Date

On Wed 16 May 2018 at 09:59, Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us> wrote:
> Mon, May 14, 2018 at 04:27:13PM CEST, vladbu@mellanox.com wrote:
>>Retry check-insert sequence in action init functions if action with same
>>index was inserted concurrently.
>>
>>Signed-off-by: Vlad Buslov <vladbu@mellanox.com>
>>---
>> net/sched/act_bpf.c | 8 +++++++-
>> net/sched/act_connmark.c | 8 +++++++-
>> net/sched/act_csum.c | 8 +++++++-
>> net/sched/act_gact.c | 8 +++++++-
>> net/sched/act_ife.c | 8 +++++++-
>> net/sched/act_ipt.c | 8 +++++++-
>> net/sched/act_mirred.c | 8 +++++++-
>> net/sched/act_nat.c | 8 +++++++-
>> net/sched/act_pedit.c | 8 +++++++-
>> net/sched/act_police.c | 9 ++++++++-
>> net/sched/act_sample.c | 8 +++++++-
>> net/sched/act_simple.c | 9 ++++++++-
>> net/sched/act_skbedit.c | 8 +++++++-
>> net/sched/act_skbmod.c | 8 +++++++-
>> net/sched/act_tunnel_key.c | 9 ++++++++-
>> net/sched/act_vlan.c | 9 ++++++++-
>> 16 files changed, 116 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>>
>>diff --git a/net/sched/act_bpf.c b/net/sched/act_bpf.c
>>index 5554bf7..7e20fdc 100644
>>--- a/net/sched/act_bpf.c
>>+++ b/net/sched/act_bpf.c
>>@@ -299,10 +299,16 @@ static int tcf_bpf_init(struct net *net, struct nlattr *nla,
>>
>> parm = nla_data(tb[TCA_ACT_BPF_PARMS]);
>>
>>+replay:
>> if (!tcf_idr_check(tn, parm->index, act, bind)) {
>> ret = tcf_idr_create(tn, parm->index, est, act,
>> &act_bpf_ops, bind, true);
>>- if (ret < 0)
>>+ /* Action with specified index was created concurrently.
>>+ * Check again.
>>+ */
>>+ if (parm->index && ret == -ENOSPC)
>>+ goto replay;
>>+ else if (ret)
>
> Hmm, looks like you are doing the same/very similar thing in every act
> code. I think it would make sense to introduce a helper function for
> this purpose.

This code uses goto so it can't be easily refactored into standalone
function. Could you specify which part of this code you suggest to
extract?

>
> [...]

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-05-16 13:55    [W:0.064 / U:3.052 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site