lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [May]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 18/18] rcu: Use pr_fmt to prefix "rcu: " to logging output
On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 01:52:48PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 05/14/2018 01:29 PM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 08:45:44AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> >> Use a consistent logging prefix for all rcu related output.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
> >
> > I took parts of this (thank you!) but have concerns about other parts.
> >
> >> ---
> >> kernel/rcu/rcu_segcblist.c | 2 ++
> >> kernel/rcu/rcuperf.c | 10 ++++---
> >> kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c | 46 +++++++++++++++----------------
> >> kernel/rcu/srcutiny.c | 2 ++
> >> kernel/rcu/srcutree.c | 5 +++-
> >> kernel/rcu/tiny.c | 3 +++
> >> kernel/rcu/tree.c | 8 +++---
> >> kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h | 67 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
> >> kernel/rcu/update.c | 19 ++++++++-----
> >> 9 files changed, 96 insertions(+), 66 deletions(-)
> >>
>
> >> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c b/kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c
> >> index 648e1c25707d..45d98ff0d5b8 100644
> >> --- a/kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c
> >> +++ b/kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c
> >> @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
> >> *
> >> * See also: Documentation/RCU/torture.txt
> >> */
> >> +
> >> #include <linux/types.h>
> >> #include <linux/kernel.h>
> >> #include <linux/init.h>
> >> @@ -908,7 +909,7 @@ rcu_torture_writer(void *arg)
> >> VERBOSE_TOROUT_STRING("rcu_torture_writer task started");
> >> if (!can_expedite)
> >> pr_alert("%s" TORTURE_FLAG
> >> - " GP expediting controlled from boot/sysfs for %s.\n",
> >> + " GP expediting controlled from boot/sysfs for %s\n",
> >> torture_type, cur_ops->name);
> >>
> >> /* Initialize synctype[] array. If none set, take default. */
> >> @@ -916,27 +917,27 @@ rcu_torture_writer(void *arg)
> >> gp_cond1 = gp_exp1 = gp_normal1 = gp_sync1 = true;
> >> if (gp_cond1 && cur_ops->get_state && cur_ops->cond_sync) {
> >> synctype[nsynctypes++] = RTWS_COND_GET;
> >> - pr_info("%s: Testing conditional GPs.\n", __func__);
> >> + pr_info("%s: Testing conditional GPs\n", __func__);
> >> } else if (gp_cond && (!cur_ops->get_state || !cur_ops->cond_sync)) {
> >> - pr_alert("%s: gp_cond without primitives.\n", __func__);
> >> + pr_alert("%s: gp_cond without primitives\n", __func__);
> >> }
> >> if (gp_exp1 && cur_ops->exp_sync) {
> >> synctype[nsynctypes++] = RTWS_EXP_SYNC;
> >> - pr_info("%s: Testing expedited GPs.\n", __func__);
> >> + pr_info("%s: Testing expedited GPs\n", __func__);
> >> } else if (gp_exp && !cur_ops->exp_sync) {
> >> - pr_alert("%s: gp_exp without primitives.\n", __func__);
> >> + pr_alert("%s: gp_exp without primitives\n", __func__);
>
> Unlike some of the others, the one above is not a sentence, so it doesn't
> _need_ a period ... except for consistency.
>
> But I don't care either way. :)

;-) ;-) ;-)

Thanx, Paul

> >> }
> >> if (gp_normal1 && cur_ops->deferred_free) {
> >> synctype[nsynctypes++] = RTWS_DEF_FREE;
> >> - pr_info("%s: Testing asynchronous GPs.\n", __func__);
> >> + pr_info("%s: Testing asynchronous GPs\n", __func__);
> >> } else if (gp_normal && !cur_ops->deferred_free) {
> >> - pr_alert("%s: gp_normal without primitives.\n", __func__);
> >> + pr_alert("%s: gp_normal without primitives\n", __func__);
> >> }
> >> if (gp_sync1 && cur_ops->sync) {
> >> synctype[nsynctypes++] = RTWS_SYNC;
> >> - pr_info("%s: Testing normal GPs.\n", __func__);
> >> + pr_info("%s: Testing normal GPs\n", __func__);
> >> } else if (gp_sync && !cur_ops->sync) {
> >> - pr_alert("%s: gp_sync without primitives.\n", __func__);
> >> + pr_alert("%s: gp_sync without primitives\n", __func__);
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> ~Randy
>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-05-14 23:05    [W:1.974 / U:0.012 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site