lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [May]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [rds-devel] KASAN: null-ptr-deref Read in rds_ib_get_mr
From
Date


On 2018/5/11 18:46, Sowmini Varadhan wrote:
> On (05/11/18 15:48), Yanjun Zhu wrote:
>> diff --git a/net/rds/ib_rdma.c b/net/rds/ib_rdma.c
>> index e678699..2228b50 100644
>> --- a/net/rds/ib_rdma.c
>> +++ b/net/rds/ib_rdma.c
>> @@ -539,11 +539,17 @@ void rds_ib_flush_mrs(void)
>> void *rds_ib_get_mr(struct scatterlist *sg, unsigned long nents,
>> struct rds_sock *rs, u32 *key_ret)
>> {
>> - struct rds_ib_device *rds_ibdev;
>> + struct rds_ib_device *rds_ibdev = NULL;
>> struct rds_ib_mr *ibmr = NULL;
>> - struct rds_ib_connection *ic = rs->rs_conn->c_transport_data;
>> + struct rds_ib_connection *ic = NULL;
>> int ret;
>>
>> + if (rs->rs_bound_addr == 0) {
>> + ret = -EPERM;
>> + goto out;
>> + }
>> +
>> + ic = rs->rs_conn->c_transport_data;
>> rds_ibdev = rds_ib_get_device(rs->rs_bound_addr);
>> if (!rds_ibdev) {
>> ret = -ENODEV;
>>
>> I made this raw patch. If you can reproduce this bug, please make tests
>> with it.
> I dont think this solves the problem, I think it
> just changes the timing under which it can still happen.
>
> what if the rds_remove_bound() in rds_bind() happens after the check
> for if (rs->rs_bound_addr == 0) added above by the patch
>
> I believe you need some type of synchronization (either
> through mutex, or some atomic flag in the rs or similar) to make
> sure rds_bind() and rds_ib_get_mr() are mutually exclusive.
Sure. I agree with you. Maybe mutex is a good choice.

Zhu Yanjun
>
> --Sowmini
>
>
>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-05-11 16:08    [W:0.037 / U:27.744 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site