lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [May]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/4] xen/PVH: Replace GDT_ENTRY with explicit constant
From
Date


On 05/01/2018 03:53 AM, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 02:07:43PM -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>> On 04/30/2018 12:57 PM, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>>> On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 12:23:36PM -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>>>> Latest binutils release (2.29.1) will no longer allow proper computation
>>>> of GDT entries on 32-bits, with warning:
>>>>
>>>> arch/x86/xen/xen-pvh.S: Assembler messages:
>>>> arch/x86/xen/xen-pvh.S:150: Warning: shift count out of range (32 is not between 0 and 31)
>>>> arch/x86/xen/xen-pvh.S:150: Warning: shift count out of range (40 is not between 0 and 31)
>>>> arch/x86/xen/xen-pvh.S:150: Warning: shift count out of range (32 is not between 0 and 31)
>>>> arch/x86/xen/xen-pvh.S:152: Warning: shift count out of range (32 is not between 0 and 31)
>>>> arch/x86/xen/xen-pvh.S:152: Warning: shift count out of range (40 is not between 0 and 31)
>>>> arch/x86/xen/xen-pvh.S:152: Warning: shift count out of range (32 is not between 0 and 31)
>>>>
>>>> Use explicit value of the entry instead of using GDT_ENTRY() macro.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
>>>> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
>>>> ---
>>>> arch/x86/xen/xen-pvh.S | 6 +++---
>>>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/xen-pvh.S b/arch/x86/xen/xen-pvh.S
>>>> index e1a5fbe..934f7d4 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/x86/xen/xen-pvh.S
>>>> +++ b/arch/x86/xen/xen-pvh.S
>>>> @@ -145,11 +145,11 @@ gdt_start:
>>>> .quad 0x0000000000000000 /* NULL descriptor */
>>>> .quad 0x0000000000000000 /* reserved */
>>>> #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
>>>> - .quad GDT_ENTRY(0xa09a, 0, 0xfffff) /* __KERNEL_CS */
>>>> + .quad 0x00af9a000000ffff /* __BOOT_CS */
>>>> #else
>>>> - .quad GDT_ENTRY(0xc09a, 0, 0xfffff) /* __KERNEL_CS */
>>>> + .quad 0x00cf9a000000ffff /* __BOOT_CS */
>>> Maybe it would be cleaner to use something like:
>>
>> I actually considered all of these and ended up with a raw number
>> because it seems to be a convention in kernel (and Xen too, apparently)
>> to use raw values in .S files.
>>
>> Kernel is using now GDT_ENTRY_INIT() which is a C macro. There is one
>> other location where GDT_INIT() is used (arch/x86/boot/pm.c) and,
>> incidentally, it also generates this warning IIRC.
>>
>> I really don't want to move definition to C code just to use a macro ---
>> I don't think C code needs to be exposed to this GDT.
>>
>>
>>>
>>> .word 0xffff /* limit */
>>> .word 0 /* base */
>>> .byte 0 /* base */
>>> .byte 0x9a /* access */
>>> #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
>>> .byte 0xaf /* flags plus limit */
>>> #else
>>> .byte 0xcf /* flags plus limit */
>>> #endif
>>> .byte 0 /* base */
>>
>>
>> I, in fact, started with something like this. But if you repeat this 4
>> times you will probably see why I decided against it ;-)
>
> Heh, right. Maybe a .macro to generate those? Or this is all too much
> for just a couple of GDT entries anyway...


That's what I thought. Especially given that assembly code seems to be
using raw values.

>
> For long mode however you could use simpler values, AFAICT the code
> segment in long mode could be simplified to:
>
> 0x00209a0000000000
>
> Because the base/limit have no effect.


True. However, we are sharing the DS (and later GS) descriptors between
32- and 64-it modes. I can separate them if you think it makes sense.

-boris


>
> In any case I'm not specially inclined either way, and maybe using
> similar values for 32 and 64bit modes makes this easier to understand
> (and decode if needed).
>
> Roger.
>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-05-01 14:16    [W:1.427 / U:0.008 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site