Messages in this thread | | | From | David Howells <> | Subject | Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the tip tree | Date | Tue, 03 Apr 2018 13:39:08 +0100 |
| |
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
> I figured that since there were only a handful of users it wasn't a > popular API, also David very much knew of those patches changing it so > could easily have pulled in the special tip/sched/wait branch :/
I'm not sure I could, since I have to base on net-next. I'm not sure what DaveM's policy on that is.
Also, it might've been better not to simply erase the atomic_t wait API immediately, but substitute wrappers for it to be removed one iteration hence.
David
| |