lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Apr]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [Letux-kernel] [PATCH v3 2/4] gpio: pca953x: add register definitions for pcal6524 and fix address calculation
On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 9:05 PM, H. Nikolaus Schaller <hns@goldelico.com> wrote:
>> Am 11.04.2018 um 07:00 schrieb H. Nikolaus Schaller <hns@goldelico.com>:
>>> Am 10.04.2018 um 20:06 schrieb Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>:
>>> On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 7:07 PM, H. Nikolaus Schaller <hns@goldelico.com> wrote:

>>>> PCAL chips ("L" seems to stand for "latched") have additional
>>>> registers starting at address 0x40 to control the latches,
>>>> interrupt mask, pull-up and pull down etc.
>>>>
>>>> The constants are so far defined in a way that they fit for
>>>> the pcal9555a when shifted by the number of banks, i.e. multiplied
>>>> by 2.
>>>>
>>>> Now the pcal6524 has 3 banks which means the relative offset
>>>> must be multiplied by 4 which gives a wrong result if not done
>>>> carefully, since the base offset is already included in the offset.
>>>>
>>>> For the basic registers shared with all pca93xx/tca64xx chips
>>>> there is no such offset.
>>>>
>>>> Therefore, we add code to adjust the register number for exended
>>>> registers to the 24 bit accessor functions.
>>>>
>>>> And we add additional register offset constants (not yet used by
>>>> the driver code) which are specific to the pcal6524.

>>> First of all, as I said, please split this to two patches. Don't mix the things.
>> Ok. Queued for v4.

I actually think it would be even more patches:
- move to hex from dec
- add new definitions for PCAL953x
- append new code for registers (see below)
- add definitions for PCAL6524

>>>> + /* adjust register address for pcal6524 */
>>>> + if (reg >= PCAL953X_OUT_STRENGTH)
>>>> + reg -= PCAL953X_OUT_STRENGTH >> 1;
>>>> +
>>>
>>> Give me some days to think about it.

So, what about something like:

--- 8< --- 8< ---
#define PCAL953X_GPIO_MASK GENMASK(5,0) // this makes sense even for
your initial solution

int bank_shift = fls((chip->gpio_chip.ngpio - 1) / BANK_SZ);
int addr = (reg & PCAL953X_GPIO_MASK) << bank_shift;
int pinctrl = (reg & ~PCAL953X_GPIO_MASK) << 1;

return i2c_smbus_write_i2c_block_data(chip->client,
pinctrl | addr | REG_ADDR_AI,
NBANK(chip), val);

// similar for read.

--- 8< --- 8< ---

Keep in mind your solution has a bug for registers starting from 0x30.

--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-04-26 12:06    [W:0.068 / U:0.124 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site