Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 26 Apr 2018 19:13:53 -0700 | From | Eduardo Valentin <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 3/3] thermal: armada_thermal: Replace mdelay with usleep_range in armada380_init_sensor |
| |
On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 04:13:28PM +0800, Jia-Ju Bai wrote: > armada380_init_sensor() is never called in atomic context. > > armada380_init_sensor() is set as ".init_sensor" in > struct armada_thermal_data. > ".init_sensor" is called armada_thermal_probe(). > armada_thermal_probe() is set as ".probe" in struct platform_driver. > This function is not called in atomic context. > > Despite never getting called from atomic context, armada380_init_sensor() > calls mdelay() to busily wait. > This is not necessary and can be replaced with usleep_range() to > avoid busy waiting. > > This is found by a static analysis tool named DCNS written by myself. > And I also manually check it. > > Signed-off-by: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@gmail.com> > --- > drivers/thermal/armada_thermal.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/thermal/armada_thermal.c b/drivers/thermal/armada_thermal.c > index ae75328..c289ae4 100644 > --- a/drivers/thermal/armada_thermal.c > +++ b/drivers/thermal/armada_thermal.c > @@ -143,7 +143,7 @@ static void armada380_init_sensor(struct platform_device *pdev, > if (!(reg & A380_HW_RESET)) { > reg |= A380_HW_RESET; > writel(reg, priv->control); > - mdelay(10); > + usleep_range(10000, 11000);
This does not apply: checking file drivers/thermal/armada_thermal.c Hunk #1 FAILED at 143. 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED
That mdelay() is not existing anymore.
> } > } > > -- > 1.9.1 >
| |