lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Apr]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] tracing/x86: Update syscall trace events to handle new x86 syscall func names
Em Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 12:57:23PM -0400, Steven Rostedt escreveu:
> On Tue, 17 Apr 2018 12:40:19 -0400
> Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 17 Apr 2018 13:35:27 -0300
> > Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> >
> > > [root@jouet ~]# perf test openat
> > > 2: Detect openat syscall event : Ok
> > > 3: Detect openat syscall event on all cpus : Ok
> > > 15: syscalls:sys_enter_openat event fields : Ok
> > > [root@jouet ~]#
> > >
> > > [root@jouet ~]# perf trace -e nanosleep,syscalls:*nanosleep sleep 1
> > > 0.000 ( ): syscalls:sys_enter_nanosleep:rqtp: 0x7ffd9f737950, rmtp: 0x00000000
> > > 0.009 ( ): sleep/7905 nanosleep(rqtp: 0x7ffd9f737950 ) ...
> > > 1000.204 ( ): syscalls:sys_exit_nanosleep:0x0
> > > 0.009 (1000.217 ms): sleep/7905 ... [continued]: nanosleep()) = 0
> > > [root@jouet ~]#
> > >
> > > Works, so the regression seems to be fixed, without looking at the code
> > > that much:
> > >
> > > Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
> >
> > But does this still work on x86_32? I'll test that out. Thanks for
> > testing, but I may have another patch soon.
>
> OK, it's still broken there with this patch. I got this:
>
> # ls /sys/kernel/tracing/events/syscalls
> enable
> filter
> sys_enter_nanosleep
> sys_exit_nanosleep
>
> But with this:
>
> return !strcmp(sym + 9, name + 3) || !strcmp(sym + 3, name + 3);
>
> I get all the syscalls back. I'll make another patch.

Argh, rebuilding the world, since lots of places include ftrace.h...

- Arnaldo

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-04-17 19:10    [W:0.067 / U:1.360 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site