lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Apr]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] fs/dcache.c: re-add cond_resched() in shrink_dcache_parent()
On Sun, Apr 15, 2018 at 10:54:55PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 15, 2018 at 09:40:54PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
>
> > BTW, the current placement of cond_resched() looks bogus; suppose we
> > have collected a lot of victims and ran into need_resched(). We leave
> > d_walk() and call shrink_dentry_list(). At that point there's a lot
> > of stuff on our shrink list and anybody else running into them will
> > have to keep scanning. Giving up the timeslice before we take care
> > of any of those looks like a bad idea, to put it mildly, and that's
> > precisely what will happen.
> >
> > What about doing that in the end of __dentry_kill() instead? And to
> > hell with both existing call sites - dput() one (before going to
> > the parent) is obviously covered by that (dentry_kill() only returns
> > non-NULL after having called __dentry_kill()) and in shrink_dentry_list()
> > we'll get to it as soon as we go through all dentries that can be
> > immediately kicked off the shrink list. Which, AFAICS, improves the
> > situation, now that shrink_lock_dentry() contains no trylock loops...
> >
> > Comments?
>
> What I mean is something like this (cumulative diff, it'll obviously need
> to be carved up into 3--4 commits):

... and carved-up version is in vfs.git#work.dcache. Could syzbot folks
hit it with their reproducers?

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-04-16 00:35    [W:0.033 / U:0.256 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site