lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Apr]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH 20/30] kconfig: add basic helper macros to scripts/Kconfig.include
On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 7:06 AM, Masahiro Yamada
<yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> wrote:
> Kconfig got text processing tools like we see in Make. Add Kconfig
> helper macros to scripts/Kconfig.include like we collect Makefile
> macros in scripts/Kbuild.include.
>
> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@gmail.com>
> ---
>
> Changes in v3:
> - Move helpers to scripts/Kconfig.include
>
> Changes in v2: None
>
> Kconfig | 2 ++
> MAINTAINERS | 1 +
> scripts/Kconfig.include | 17 +++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 20 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 scripts/Kconfig.include
>
> diff --git a/Kconfig b/Kconfig
> index 5b55d87..a90d9f9 100644
> --- a/Kconfig
> +++ b/Kconfig
> @@ -7,4 +7,6 @@ mainmenu "Linux/$(ARCH) $(KERNELVERSION) Kernel Configuration"
>
> comment "Compiler: $(CC_VERSION_TEXT)"
>
> +source "scripts/Kconfig.include"
> +
> source "arch/$(SRCARCH)/Kconfig"
> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> index b9dab38..d962f4a 100644
> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> @@ -7624,6 +7624,7 @@ L: linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org
> S: Maintained
> F: Documentation/kbuild/kconfig*
> F: scripts/kconfig/
> +F: scripts/Kconfig.include
>
> KDUMP
> M: Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>
> diff --git a/scripts/Kconfig.include b/scripts/Kconfig.include
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..cac7a81
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/scripts/Kconfig.include
> @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
> +# Kconfig helper macros
> +
> +# Convenient variables
> +comma := ,
> +quote := "
> +squote := '
> +empty :=
> +space := $(empty) $(empty)
> +
> +# y if the command exits with 0, n otherwise
> +success = $(shell ($(1)) >/dev/null 2>&1 && echo y || echo n)

'{ $(1); }' might work here, to avoid the extra subshell.

Shaves 20-30% off the runtime here in a silly
system("(true) >/dev/null 2>&1 && echo y || echo n") vs.
system("{ true; } >/dev/null 2>&1 && echo y || echo n")
comparison.

> +
> +# y if the given compiler flag is supported, n otherwise
> +cc-option = $(success $(CC) -Werror $(1) -c -x c /dev/null -o /dev/null)
> +
> +# y if the given linker flag is supported, n otherwise
> +ld-option = $(success $(LD) -v $(1))
> --
> 2.7.4
>

Cheers,
Ulf

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-04-15 09:41    [W:0.182 / U:6.160 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site