lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Apr]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: linux-next: build warning after merge of the pm tree
Date
On Monday, April 9, 2018 3:24:38 AM CEST Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
> --Sig_/QL=OZEguM./+7xhHdQruHaV
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
> Hi Rafael,
>
> After merging the pm tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> multi_v7_defconfig) produced this warning:
>
> kernel/time/tick-sched.c: In function 'tick_nohz_idle_exit':
> kernel/time/tick-sched.c:1162:3: warning: 'now' may be used uninitialized i=
> n this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
> __tick_nohz_idle_restart_tick(ts, now);
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> kernel/time/tick-sched.c:1146:10: note: 'now' was declared here
> ktime_t now;
> ^~~
>
> This appears to be a false positive.
>
> And another in the x86_64 allmodconfig build:
>
> kernel/time/tick-sched.c: In function 'tick_nohz_idle_exit':
> kernel/time/tick-sched.c:538:2: warning: 'now' may be used uninitialized in=
> this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
> update_ts_time_stats(smp_processor_id(), ts, now, NULL);
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> kernel/time/tick-sched.c:1146:10: note: 'now' was declared here
> ktime_t now;
> ^~~
>
> also looks like a false positive.

Yes, they are false positives AFAICS.

Cheers,
Rafael

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-04-10 09:06    [W:0.041 / U:0.224 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site