[lkml]   [2018]   [Mar]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 1/5] x86/kvm: rename HV_X64_MSR_APIC_ASSIST_PAGE to HV_X64_MSR_VP_ASSIST_PAGE
"Michael Kelley (EOSG)" <> writes:

>> >> > Removing definitions from userspace api isn't a good idea.
>> >> >
>> >> > I have no idea why hyper.h is a userspace api, though -- Linux doesn't
>> >> > define any of those, so we could copy the definitions to a private
>> >> > header, rename, and never look at this file again.
>> >>
>> >> That was a thinko when it was moved to uapi, and it has already been
>> >> identified as a problem, so now QEMU has its own header with the
>> >> definitions it needs, and I'm unaware of any other userspace project
>> >> that depends on this stuff. So I've been planning to remove it from
>> >> uapi but still haven't got around to posting the patch :(
>> >
>> > Great, let's be bold here.
>> asm/hyperv.h is not uapi.
>> I would include a patch renaming arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/hyperv.h to
>> arch/x86/include/asm/hyperv.h but we already have 'mshyperv.h' there and
>> I don't quite understand the difference. We can either merge them or
>> come up with a rule distinguishing them.
>> K. Y., Michael, what do you think?
> Good timing for this topic, as I'm now looking at cloning these two
> files into the arch/arm64 tree for Hyper-V on ARM64. It would be great
> to get a plan agreed on so I can be consistent on the arm64 side.
> I would suggest keeping two files: one with just the data structures and
> #defines that come from the Hyper-V Top-Level Functional Spec (TLFS),
> and the other with additional data structures, macros, function prototypes,
> etc. that are specific to Linux guest code. uapi/asm/hyperv.h is already
> the first one, and asm/mshyperv.h is mostly the second one, though it has
> some things that should probably move to the first one. There are also a
> few stray definitions from the Hyper-V TLFS in drivers/pci/host/pci-hyperv.c
> that really belong in the first file.
> And since we're already changing the location of the first file, let's rename
> it to hyperv-tlfs.h or something similar.

Sounds good,

I'll add a patch or two to my eVMCS series.



 \ /
  Last update: 2018-03-08 17:57    [W:0.041 / U:1.076 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site