lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Mar]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v7 0/5] Add Intel IOMMU debugfs support
From
Date
On 03/29/2018 03:48 AM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> [ Adding Gary from AMD to Cc ]
>
> On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 09:37:14AM -0700, Jacob Pan wrote:
>> On Thu, 15 Mar 2018 14:18:54 +0100
>> Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org> wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 08:38:11AM -0800, Jacob Pan wrote:
>>>> Just wondering if your concern is on the implementation or the
>>>> debugfs idea in general. Perhaps have some common IOMMU debugfs?
>>>
>>> My concern mainly is that we add interfaces which reveal
>>> potentially security relevant information
>> I don;t think security is any worse than existing kernel page table in
>> debugfs. i.e. /sys/kernel/debug/page_tables
>> This is a debug feature.
>
> Okay, so here is the way to go: Please introduce a basic debugfs
> facility to the core iommu code. It should basically only create a
> 'iommu/' directory in debugfs where drivers can create their own
> sub-directories. This must be enabled by a new kconfig option
> (CONFIG_IOMMU_DEBUGFS) and the kernel should print a big fat warning at
> boot when it is enabled. This hopefully prevents anyone from enabling it
> for production kernels.

I'm halfway through this. Where would you like to place the invocation
of the initialization function?

There's an iommu_init() in iommu.c, But it's a core_initcall, which
doesn't seem like a good spot. Not knowing enough about bring-up here,
Would adding another __init function be suitable?

Gary

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-03-29 17:53    [W:0.085 / U:1.404 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site