Messages in this thread | | | From | "陈华才" <> | Subject | Re: Regression with arm in next with stack protector | Date | Tue, 27 Mar 2018 16:29:12 +0800 |
| |
Allwinner devices are OK, Exynos devices (except 4210) are OK.
------------------ Original ------------------ From: "Tony Lindgren"<tony@atomide.com>; Date: Mon, Mar 26, 2018 11:37 PM To: "陈华才"<chenhc@lemote.com>; Cc: "Andrew Morton"<akpm@linux-foundation.org>; "Fabio Estevam"<festevam@gmail.com>; "Stephen Rothwell"<sfr@canb.auug.org.au>; "Rich Felker"<dalias@libc.org>; "Russell King"<linux@arm.linux.org.uk>; "Yoshinori Sato"<ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>; "linux-kernel"<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>; "Ralf Baechle"<ralf@linux-mips.org>; "linux-omap"<linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>; "James Hogan"<james.hogan@mips.com>; "moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE"<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>; Subject: Re: Regression with arm in next with stack protector * 陈华才 <chenhc@lemote.com> [180326 06:59]: > Hi, Tony and Fabio, > > Could you please upload your kernel binary to somewhere for me? I don't understand why some ARM boards is OK while others are broken.
Well the kernel I'm testing is just current Linux next cross compiled omap2plus_defconfig kernel. I do have few more config options enabled like LOCKDEP and DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP, but I doubt they matter here :)
Then I'm using gcc-7.3.0 and binutils-2.30 built with the buildall.git scripts:
git://git.infradead.org/users/segher/buildall.git
If you still need binaries, let me know.
Do you know which arm devices are working with your patch?
Regards,
Tony | |