lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Mar]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: linux-next: manual merge of the ftrace tree with the jc_docs tree
From
Date
Hi Stephen,

On Thu, 2018-03-22 at 09:21 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> On Wed, 21 Mar 2018 15:55:52 -0500 Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > Yeah, linux-next has changes to Documentation/trace/* that converts
> > those files to .rst, which linux-trace/frace/core doesn't have.
> >
> > I've rebased the inter-event patches to linux-next/next-20180320 to
> > reflect those changes, which affect 9 of the files in the patchset. The
> > updated patchset is here:
> >
> > https://github.com/tzanussi/linux-trace-inter-event.git tzanussi/next-20180320-inter-event-v10
> > https://github.com/tzanussi/linux-trace-inter-event/tree/tzanussi/next-20180320-inter-event-v10
> >
> > I can repost the whole thing as v10, or whatever makes sense here.
>
> Thanks, I assume that they apply on top of the jc_docs tree as well
> (git://git.lwn.net/linux.git#docs-next). If so, then I can use them as
> merge resolutions, or Steve can rebase his tree (minus your old
> patches) on top of the (hopefully unchanging) jc_docs tree and then he
> could apply your patches there.
>

Yes, just checked and they do apply on top of the jc_docs branch
mentioned.

Thanks,

Tom



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-03-22 00:10    [W:0.055 / U:0.072 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site