lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Mar]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3 1/2] dt-bindings: add bindings doc for HiSilicon INNO USB2 PHY
On Fri, Mar 02, 2018 at 01:35:43PM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
> >>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/phy-hisi-inno-usb2.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/phy-hisi-inno-usb2.txt
> >>> new file mode 100644
> >>> index 000000000000..b563cf54ca7b
> >>> --- /dev/null
> >>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/phy-hisi-inno-usb2.txt
> >>> @@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
> >>> +HiSilicon INNO USB2 PHY
> >>> +
> >>> +Required properties:
> >>> +- compatible: Should be one of the following strings:
> >>> + "hisilicon,inno-usb2-phy",
> >>> + "hisilicon,hi3798cv200-usb2-phy".
> >>> +- reg: Should be the address space for PHY configuration register in peripheral
> >>> + controller, e.g. PERI_USB0 for USB 2.0 PHY01 on Hi3798cv200 SoC.
> >>> +- #phy-cells: Should be 1. The specifier is the index of the PHY port to
> >>> + reference.
> >>
> >> This can be '0' if the consumers directly use phandle to the subnodes.
> >
> > Yes, I understand that for most of PHY devices #phy-cells is just 0, and
> > consumers simply use the phandle without any cell number. But for this
> > inno-usb2-phy, every single device contains two PHY ports, and each port
>
> Why not have a separate sub-node for each phy port? Then you can just use
> phandle to the subnode in the controller node.

It sounds like a sensible suggestion. I will try to implement that and
see how it goes. Thanks.

Shawn

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-03-02 09:46    [W:0.047 / U:0.572 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site