lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Mar]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH V2] nvme-pci: assign separate irq vectors for adminq and ioq0
From
Date

> Note that we originally allocates irqs this way, and Keith changed
> it a while ago for good reasons. So I'd really like to see good
> reasons for moving away from this, and some heuristics to figure
> out which way to use. E.g. if the device supports more irqs than
> I/O queues your scheme might always be fine.

I still don't understand what this buys us in practice. Seems redundant
to allocate another vector without any (even marginal) difference.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-03-01 10:29    [W:0.141 / U:0.044 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site