lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Feb]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH 4.15 10/23] Revert "defer call to mem_cgroup_sk_alloc()"
Date
4.15-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>


[ Upstream commit edbe69ef2c90fc86998a74b08319a01c508bd497 ]

This patch effectively reverts commit 9f1c2674b328 ("net: memcontrol:
defer call to mem_cgroup_sk_alloc()").

Moving mem_cgroup_sk_alloc() to the inet_csk_accept() completely breaks
memcg socket memory accounting, as packets received before memcg
pointer initialization are not accounted and are causing refcounting
underflow on socket release.

Actually the free-after-use problem was fixed by
commit c0576e397508 ("net: call cgroup_sk_alloc() earlier in
sk_clone_lock()") for the cgroup pointer.

So, let's revert it and call mem_cgroup_sk_alloc() just before
cgroup_sk_alloc(). This is safe, as we hold a reference to the socket
we're cloning, and it holds a reference to the memcg.

Also, let's drop BUG_ON(mem_cgroup_is_root()) check from
mem_cgroup_sk_alloc(). I see no reasons why bumping the root
memcg counter is a good reason to panic, and there are no realistic
ways to hit it.

Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
mm/memcontrol.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
net/core/sock.c | 5 +----
net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c | 1 -
3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -5828,6 +5828,20 @@ void mem_cgroup_sk_alloc(struct sock *sk
if (!mem_cgroup_sockets_enabled)
return;

+ /*
+ * Socket cloning can throw us here with sk_memcg already
+ * filled. It won't however, necessarily happen from
+ * process context. So the test for root memcg given
+ * the current task's memcg won't help us in this case.
+ *
+ * Respecting the original socket's memcg is a better
+ * decision in this case.
+ */
+ if (sk->sk_memcg) {
+ css_get(&sk->sk_memcg->css);
+ return;
+ }
+
rcu_read_lock();
memcg = mem_cgroup_from_task(current);
if (memcg == root_mem_cgroup)
--- a/net/core/sock.c
+++ b/net/core/sock.c
@@ -1675,16 +1675,13 @@ struct sock *sk_clone_lock(const struct
newsk->sk_dst_pending_confirm = 0;
newsk->sk_wmem_queued = 0;
newsk->sk_forward_alloc = 0;
-
- /* sk->sk_memcg will be populated at accept() time */
- newsk->sk_memcg = NULL;
-
atomic_set(&newsk->sk_drops, 0);
newsk->sk_send_head = NULL;
newsk->sk_userlocks = sk->sk_userlocks & ~SOCK_BINDPORT_LOCK;
atomic_set(&newsk->sk_zckey, 0);

sock_reset_flag(newsk, SOCK_DONE);
+ mem_cgroup_sk_alloc(newsk);
cgroup_sk_alloc(&newsk->sk_cgrp_data);

rcu_read_lock();
--- a/net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c
@@ -475,7 +475,6 @@ struct sock *inet_csk_accept(struct sock
}
spin_unlock_bh(&queue->fastopenq.lock);
}
- mem_cgroup_sk_alloc(newsk);
out:
release_sock(sk);
if (req)

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-02-09 14:52    [W:0.168 / U:1.640 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site