Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH v5 2/3] GHES: add a notify chain for process memory section | From | Xie XiuQi <> | Date | Thu, 8 Feb 2018 16:41:23 +0800 |
| |
Hi Boris,
Thanks for your comments.
On 2018/2/7 18:31, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 08:31:24PM +0800, Xie XiuQi wrote: >> Add a notify chain for process memory section, with >> which other modules might do error recovery. >> >> Signed-off-by: Xie XiuQi <xiexiuqi@huawei.com> >> Tested-by: Wang Xiongfeng <wangxiongfeng2@huawei.com> >> Tested-by: Tyler Baicar <tbaicar@codeaurora.org> >> --- >> drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c | 10 ++++++++++ >> include/acpi/ghes.h | 8 ++++++++ >> 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c >> index cff671d..1f0ebfb 100644 >> --- a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c >> +++ b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c >> @@ -109,6 +109,9 @@ static inline bool is_hest_type_generic_v2(struct ghes *ghes) >> static LIST_HEAD(ghes_hed); >> static DEFINE_MUTEX(ghes_list_mutex); >> >> +ATOMIC_NOTIFIER_HEAD(ghes_mem_err_chain); >> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(ghes_mem_err_chain); > > Definitely not EXPORT_SYMBOL. > > And certainly not export the notifier head. Have register and unregister > functions instead. > > That is, *if* you can't solve it differently with James. Notifiers > should be avoided if possible. >
Yes, I saw the patchset, I agree. I will work with James to solve the problem.
-- Thanks, Xie XiuQi
| |