lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Feb]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/2] rcu: Transform kfree_rcu() into kvfree_rcu()
On Wed, 7 Feb 2018 08:57:00 -0500
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:

> On Wed, 7 Feb 2018 00:31:04 -0800
> "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> > I see problems. We would then have two different names for exactly the
> > same thing.
> >
> > Seems like it would be a lot easier to simply document the existing
> > kfree_rcu() behavior, especially given that it apparently already works.
> > The really doesn't seem to me to be worth a name change.
>
> Honestly, I don't believe this is an RCU sub-system decision. This is a
> memory management decision.
>
> If we have kmalloc(), vmalloc(), kfree(), vfree() and kvfree(), and we
> want kmalloc() to be freed with kfree(), and vmalloc() to be freed with
> vfree(), and for strange reasons, we don't know how the data was
> allocated we have kvfree(). That's an mm decision not an rcu one. We
> should have kfree_rcu(), vfree_rcu() and kvfree_rcu(), and honestly,
> they should not depend on kvfree() doing the same thing for everything.
> Each should call the corresponding member that they represent. Which
> would change this patch set.
>
> Why? Too much coupling between RCU and MM. What if in the future
> something changes and kvfree() goes away or changes drastically. We
> would then have to go through all the users of RCU to change them too.
>
> To me kvfree() is a special case and should not be used by RCU as a
> generic function. That would make RCU and MM much more coupled than
> necessary.

For the record, I fully agree with Steve here.

And being a performance "fanatic" I don't like to have the extra branch
(and compares) in the free code path... but it's a MM-decision (and
sometimes you should not listen to "fanatics" ;-))

void kvfree(const void *addr)
{
if (is_vmalloc_addr(addr))
vfree(addr);
else
kfree(addr);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(kvfree);

--
Best regards,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer
MSc.CS, Principal Kernel Engineer at Red Hat
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer


static inline bool is_vmalloc_addr(const void *x)
{
#ifdef CONFIG_MMU
unsigned long addr = (unsigned long)x;

return addr >= VMALLOC_START && addr < VMALLOC_END;
#else
return false;
#endif
}

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-02-07 17:45    [W:0.068 / U:0.252 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site