Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 20 Feb 2018 11:07:55 +0100 | From | Thierry Reding <> | Subject | Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 19 (gpu/drm/pl111/) |
| |
On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 10:30:06AM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote: > [add Eric + dri-devel] > > On 02/19/18 09:26, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > On 02/18/18 18:14, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > >> Hi all, > >> > >> Changes since 20180216: > >> > >> The nand tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree. > >> > >> The drm tree gained conflicts against Linus' tree. > > > > on i386 (randconfig): > > > > warning: (DRM_PL111) selects DRM_DUMB_VGA_DAC which has unmet direct dependencies (HAS_IOMEM && DRM && DRM_BRIDGE && OF)
I think this is caused by the fact that DRM_PL111 has || COMPILE_TEST in the architecture dependencies, which causes it to be unavailable on systems other than ARM and ARM64 where OF may not be implied. Then the DRM_PL111 selects DRM_DUMB_VGA_DAC that has a dependency on OF.
I think the best solution would be to remove the select DRM_DUMB_VGA_DAC from DRM_PL111. Also see the warning against selecting visible symbols in Documentation/kbuild/kconfig-language.txt (line 127).
> > and then > > > > ../drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/dumb-vga-dac.c: In function 'dumb_vga_probe': > > ../drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/dumb-vga-dac.c:207:13: error: 'struct drm_bridge' has no member named 'of_node' > > vga->bridge.of_node = pdev->dev.of_node; > > ^
Irrespective of the above, I don't think it's very useful to have of_node conditionally included in this structure. This used to be the case for struct gpio_chip (and others) and used to cause lots of such build failures because people tend not to build-test OF vs. !OF
Thierry [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |