Messages in this thread | ![/](/images/icornerl.gif) | | Date | Tue, 4 Dec 2018 11:54:14 +0100 | From | Greg Kroah-Hartman <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2] ptp: fix an IS_ERR() vs NULL check |
| |
On Tue, Dec 04, 2018 at 10:00:33AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > Hi Greg, > > I meant to CC you but I screwed up and added you to the From header > instead... :( > > Why did you commit 3b1ad360acad ("pps: using ERR_PTR instead of NULL > while pps_register_source fails")? You're not listed as a maintainer so > I wouldn't have known to CC you.
The maintainer told me to do so, see this email thread: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/44edc27b-e679-24e8-aef1-fe5b7570f982@enneenne.com/
> The back story is that the last chunk which changes drivers/ptp/ptp_clock.c > was dropped by mistake and it's not there in linux-next. I wrote a > patch which adds it, but everyone is super confused now... Here is > YueHaibing's original patch btw, for reference. > https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg535929.html
If you want me to take a fixup patch for this, I will be glad to. I can also drop it from my tree as well, just let me know.
Sorry for the confusion.
greg k-h
| ![\](/images/icornerr.gif) |