lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Oct]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 01/11] arch/x86: Start renaming the rdt files to more generic names
    From
    Date
    Hi Babu,

    On 10/5/2018 1:55 PM, Moger, Babu wrote:
    > New generation of AMD processors start support RDT(or QOS) features.
    > With more than one vendors supporting these features, it seems more
    > appropriate to rename these files.
    >
    > Signed-off-by: Babu Moger <babu.moger@amd.com>
    > ---
    > arch/x86/include/asm/{intel_rdt_sched.h => rdt_sched.h} | 0
    > arch/x86/kernel/cpu/Makefile | 6 +++---
    > arch/x86/kernel/cpu/{intel_rdt.c => rdt.c} | 4 ++--
    > arch/x86/kernel/cpu/{intel_rdt.h => rdt.h} | 0
    > .../cpu/{intel_rdt_ctrlmondata.c => rdt_ctrlmondata.c} | 2 +-
    > arch/x86/kernel/cpu/{intel_rdt_monitor.c => rdt_monitor.c} | 2 +-
    > .../cpu/{intel_rdt_pseudo_lock.c => rdt_pseudo_lock.c} | 6 +++---
    > ...ntel_rdt_pseudo_lock_event.h => rdt_pseudo_lock_event.h} | 2 +-
    > .../x86/kernel/cpu/{intel_rdt_rdtgroup.c => rdt_rdtgroup.c} | 4 ++--
    > arch/x86/kernel/process_32.c | 2 +-
    > arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c | 2 +-
    > 11 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
    > rename arch/x86/include/asm/{intel_rdt_sched.h => rdt_sched.h} (100%)
    > rename arch/x86/kernel/cpu/{intel_rdt.c => rdt.c} (99%)
    > rename arch/x86/kernel/cpu/{intel_rdt.h => rdt.h} (100%)
    > rename arch/x86/kernel/cpu/{intel_rdt_ctrlmondata.c => rdt_ctrlmondata.c} (99%)
    > rename arch/x86/kernel/cpu/{intel_rdt_monitor.c => rdt_monitor.c} (99%)
    > rename arch/x86/kernel/cpu/{intel_rdt_pseudo_lock.c => rdt_pseudo_lock.c} (99%)
    > rename arch/x86/kernel/cpu/{intel_rdt_pseudo_lock_event.h => rdt_pseudo_lock_event.h} (95%)
    > rename arch/x86/kernel/cpu/{intel_rdt_rdtgroup.c => rdt_rdtgroup.c} (99%)

    During the RFC it was agreed that "resctrl" will be the neutral name and
    "intel_rdt", "amd_qos", or "arm mpam" would be the vendor specific names.

    It is ok to delay that renaming but I think any renaming done from this
    point should respect this agreement.

    For example, if you want to rename intel_rdt.c then please rename it to
    resctrl.c instead of just rdt.c which does not represent a generic name
    as expressed as a goal in the subject of this patch.

    Reinette

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2018-10-09 18:40    [W:2.186 / U:0.284 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site